Published 2005
by Routledge in New York .
Written in
Edition Notes
Includes index.
| Statement | edited by Vanessa Martin. |
| Contributions | Martin, Vanessa. |
| Classifications | |
|---|---|
| LC Classifications | DS274.2.G7 A58 2005 |
| The Physical Object | |
| Pagination | p. cm. |
| ID Numbers | |
| Open Library | OL3392444M |
| ISBN 10 | 041537295X |
| LC Control Number | 2005001708 |
Anglo-Iranian relations have had a long and complex history, characterized on the one hand by mistrust and intrusion and on the other by mutual exchange and understanding. This book explores the intriguing history of this interactive relationship since , looking at it from a variety of perspectives. Anglo-Iranian relations have had a long and complex history, characterized on the one hand by mistrust and intrusion and on the other by mutual exchange and understanding. This book explores the intriguing history of this interactive relationship since , looking at it from a variety of by: 2. Anglo-Iranian Relations since (Royal Asiatic Society Books) - Kindle edition by Martin, Vanessa. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Anglo-Iranian Relations since (Royal Asiatic Society Books).4/5(1). Thus is Anglo-Iranian Relations since a mixed bag. Most articles are useful to historians but only a few deliver the promised new insights into the interplay of Anglo-Iranian social and cultural ties. The publisher's absurd asking price--nearing a dollar per page of text--will keep even these out of reach. Michael Rubin Middle East Quarterly4/5(1).
Anglo-Iranian relations have had a long and complex history, characterized on the one hand by mistrust and intrusion and on the other by mutual exchange and understanding. This book explores the intriguing history of this interactive relationship since , looking at it from a variety of : Anglo-Iranian relations have had a long and complex history, characterized on the one hand by mistrust and intrusion and on the other by mutual exchange and understanding. This book explores the intriguing history of this interactive relationship since , looking at it from a variety of : Taylor And Francis. Thus, Anglo-Iranian Relations since is a mixed bag. Most articles are useful to historians, but only a few deliver the promised new insights into the interplay of Anglo-Iranian social and cultural ties. The publisher's absurd asking price—about 60 cents per page of text—will keep even these out of : Michael Rubin. Anglo-Iranian relations have had a long and complex history, characterized on the one hand by mistrust and intrusion and on the other by mutual exchange and understanding. This book explores the intriguing history of this interactive relationship since , looking at it from a variety of : Routledge.
Anglo-Iranian relations have had a long and complex history, characterized on the one hand by mistrust and intrusion, and on the other by mutual exchange and understanding. This book explores the intriguing history of this interactive relationship since , looking at it from a variety of perspectives.3/5(1). Informationen zum Autor Vanessa Martin is Reader in Middle Eastern History at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of Islam and Modernism: the Iranian Revolution of (), Creating an Islamic State () and The Qajar Pact: Bargaining, Protest and the State in Nineteenth-Century Iran (). She is joint series editor of Routledge/BIPS Persian Studies . Anglo-Iranian Relations since With contributions from renowned experts in the field, this book provides an excellent background to the history of Anglo-Iranian relations. Focusing on the political and economic relationship of Britain and issues of strategic sensitivity, the book also illuminates British relations Author: Eliat Aram. As in the later s and early s it was the Persian Gulf that was to become the focal point of Anglo-Iranian relations in the later s and early s, not because of any particular British initiative which ran counter to Iranian claims but rather because the traditional British commitments to the area were weakening and Iran was.
